James Holder, the co-founder of the renowned British fashion brand Superdry, has been found guilty of rape following a five-day trial at Gloucester Crown Court.
The 54-year-old fashion mogul was convicted by a jury of seven men and five women, though he was acquitted of a separate charge of assault by penetration. The jury’s verdict has sent shockwaves through the fashion world, given Holder’s prominent status in the industry.
Judge David Chidgey denied Holder’s application for bail after the conviction, stating that his “significant resources” made him a flight risk. The judge also expressed concern that Holder could attempt to flee the country, particularly after the defendant had requested bail to “get his affairs in order” and say goodbye to his family.
The court heard that the incident took place on May 6, 2022, after Holder had gone on an unplanned night out. The evening ended at the victim’s apartment, where Holder and the woman were both involved. According to testimony, Holder initially entered the woman’s taxi, despite her having ordered separate cabs, and was later invited into her home.
Prosecutor James Haskell told the court that Holder made a series of advances on the woman, including pulling her onto the bed and continuing to touch her despite her clear attempts to resist. The victim reportedly began crying but was not released until she managed to escape the bedroom. Holder left the flat shortly after the woman managed to flee.
The prosecution’s case was supported by a video-recorded interview with the victim, given in July 2022, after the incident was reported to the police. In a police interview, Holder defended his actions, stating that he had a “love of women and sex” and adding that his instincts were to “protect” the victim. He also claimed he could “handle alcohol well.”
Superdry, the brand Holder co-founded, issued a statement distancing itself from the case. The company confirmed that Holder had resigned as a director and employee in 2016 and ended his consultancy role in 2019. “The case relates to an incident in 2022, long after any role with Superdry had ended,” the company said. “The court case does not relate to Superdry, its premises, employees, or business activity. As this remains a matter for the court, Superdry cannot comment further.